古脊椎动物学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (1): 69-84.DOI: 10.19615/j.cnki.2096-9899.231120CSTR: 32090.14.j.cnki.2096-9899.231120
• • 上一篇
Anek R. SANKHYAN1, Olivier CHAVASSEAU2,*()
收稿日期:
2023-05-08
出版日期:
2024-01-20
发布日期:
2024-01-17
通讯作者:
* olivier.chavasseau@univ-poitiers.frAnek R. SANKHYAN1, Olivier CHAVASSEAU2,*()
Received:
2023-05-08
Published:
2024-01-20
Online:
2024-01-17
Contact:
* olivier.chavasseau@univ-poitiers.fr摘要:
描述了印度北部比拉斯布尔区喜马偕尔邦Haritalyangar地区中西瓦利克的猪类化石上、下颌及牙齿材料。Haritalyangar地区以晚中新世动物群、古人类和其他灵长类动物的多样性而闻名。研究材料为作者之一(ARS)在该地区多次野外季采集的猪类化石;猪类化石地点和最近报道的长鼻类化石地点(含古猿化石地点)均被绘制在地图上。这些化石地点广泛分布于Makkan Khad到 Sir Khad区域内的“Lower Alternations”层和“Upper Alternations”层。猪类化石被鉴定为3个属:原河猪属Propotamochoerus (P. hysudricus)、河马齿河猪属Hippopotamodon (H. sivalense) 和云南猪属Yunnanochoerus (Y. dangari)。 Propotamochoerus hysudricus 为中西瓦利克最常见的化石猪类,新发现的Yunnanochoerus dangari进一步证明这种古猪类化石仅在Haritalyangar地区有少量遗存。Haritalyangar地区新发现的猪类化石组成与巴基斯坦的Nagri动物群相近。基于猪类化石进行的Potwar高原年代地层学对比表明,Haritalyangar地区的“Lower Alternations”层的年龄范围为~10-9 Ma, 与最新的磁极性地层学年代范围很接近。
中图分类号:
Anek R. SANKHYAN, Olivier CHAVASSEAU. 印度Haritalyangar地区晚中新世猪类化石新材料. 古脊椎动物学报, 2024, 62(1): 69-84.
Anek R. SANKHYAN, Olivier CHAVASSEAU. New suoid remains (Mammalia, Artiodactyla) from the Late Miocene of Haritalyangar, India. Vertebrata Palasiatica, 2024, 62(1): 69-84.
Fig. 1 Map of the region of Haritalyangar showing the localities that yielded fossil suoids The hominoid and proboscidean bearing localities are also indicated. Suoid Localities: 1. Ghori S; 2. Kutla/Karan E; 6. Kherin W; 10. Dholkhana lower; 11. Dholkhana Upper; 14. Barog S/Cap-Ridge; 19. Hari mid Scarp; 23. Dangar East (Dhagiala); 26. Targhel SW. Dashed lines: limits between the formations (modified after Johnson et al., 1983); B. Boulder Conglomerate; L. ‘Lower Alternations’ (=equivalent to the Nagri Fm. of the Siwaliks of Pakistan); N. Nahan Formation (=equivalent to the Chinji Fm. of the Siwaliks of Pakistan); U. ‘Upper Alternations’ (= equivalent to the Dhok Pathan Fm. of the Siwaliks of Pakistan)
Specimen | Locality number | Taxon | length × breadth | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P3 | P4 | M1 | M2 | M3 | |||
HTA-42a | 6 | P. hysudricus | 13.2×12.2 | 12.0×14.6 | 14.9×15.1 | -×19.6 | 28.9×20.2 |
HTA-42b | 6 | P. hysudricus | - | 12.6×14.6 | 14.8×- | 21.4×19.3 | 28.7×20.8 |
HTA-140a | 23 | P. hysudricus | - | - | - | 21.2×19.2 | 29.5×20.4 |
HTA-140b | 23 | P. hysudricus | - | - | 14.2×13.8 | 21.1×19.4 | 29.3×20.2 |
HTA-126a | 19 | P. hysudricus | - | 13.1×14.4 | 14.8×14.6 | - | - |
HTA-5/79 | 6 | P. hysudricus | -×9.1 | 11.0×12.4 | - | - | - |
HTA-20 | 1 | H. sivalense | >35×>30 |
Table 1 Upper teeth measurements of the new suoid material from Haritalyangar, India (mm)
Specimen | Locality number | Taxon | length × breadth | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P3 | P4 | M1 | M2 | M3 | |||
HTA-42a | 6 | P. hysudricus | 13.2×12.2 | 12.0×14.6 | 14.9×15.1 | -×19.6 | 28.9×20.2 |
HTA-42b | 6 | P. hysudricus | - | 12.6×14.6 | 14.8×- | 21.4×19.3 | 28.7×20.8 |
HTA-140a | 23 | P. hysudricus | - | - | - | 21.2×19.2 | 29.5×20.4 |
HTA-140b | 23 | P. hysudricus | - | - | 14.2×13.8 | 21.1×19.4 | 29.3×20.2 |
HTA-126a | 19 | P. hysudricus | - | 13.1×14.4 | 14.8×14.6 | - | - |
HTA-5/79 | 6 | P. hysudricus | -×9.1 | 11.0×12.4 | - | - | - |
HTA-20 | 1 | H. sivalense | >35×>30 |
Specimen | Locality number | Taxon | length × breadth | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
p2 | p3 | p4 | m1 | m2 | m3 | |||
HTA-8a | 1 | P. hysudricus | 9.8×4.0 | 13.9×5.8 | 14.6×9.5 | 14.6×11.6 | 18.8×14.3 | 30.0*×15.2* |
HTA-8b | 1 | P. hysudricus | 10.9×4.9 | 14.2×5.9 | 15.1×10.1 | 14.6×12.6 | 18.9×14.7 | 31.8×16.3 |
HTA-126b | 19 | P. hysudricus | - | - | - | 19.4×14.6 | 24.1×18.2 | - |
HTA-141 | 23 | P. hysudricus | - | - | - | 17.9×12.5 | 22.9×16.4 | - |
HTA-154 | 23 | Y. dangari | 20.6×11.7 | 21.1×11.6 |
Table 2 Permanent lower teeth measurements of the new suoid material from Haritalyangar, India (mm)
Specimen | Locality number | Taxon | length × breadth | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
p2 | p3 | p4 | m1 | m2 | m3 | |||
HTA-8a | 1 | P. hysudricus | 9.8×4.0 | 13.9×5.8 | 14.6×9.5 | 14.6×11.6 | 18.8×14.3 | 30.0*×15.2* |
HTA-8b | 1 | P. hysudricus | 10.9×4.9 | 14.2×5.9 | 15.1×10.1 | 14.6×12.6 | 18.9×14.7 | 31.8×16.3 |
HTA-126b | 19 | P. hysudricus | - | - | - | 19.4×14.6 | 24.1×18.2 | - |
HTA-141 | 23 | P. hysudricus | - | - | - | 17.9×12.5 | 22.9×16.4 | - |
HTA-154 | 23 | Y. dangari | 20.6×11.7 | 21.1×11.6 |
Fig. 2 New material of Propotamochoerus hysudricus and Hippopotamodon sivalense from Haritalyangar A-H. Propotamochoerus hysudricus: A. HTA-8a, right mandible with p4-m3 (p2-p3 not displayed); B. HTA-8b, left mandible with p2-m3; C. HTA-42a, left maxilla with P3-M3; D. HTA-42b, right maxilla with P4-M3; E. HTA-140a, right maxilla with M2-M3; F. HTA-140b, right maxilla with M1-M3; G, H. left dp4, HTA-7 (G) and interpretive drawing (H); I, J. Hippopotamodon sivalense, right dp4, HTA-63 (I) and interpretive drawing (J). All specimens are figured in occlusal view. Scale bars equal 1 cm Abbreviations: E. entoconid; EnPa. endoparaconulid; H. hypoconid; Hul. hypoconulid; M. metaconid; Mes. mesoconulid; P. protoconid; Pa. paraconid; Pprm. preprimonid; Prm. primonid
Fig. 3 New material of Yunnanochoerus dangari from Haritalyangar A-D. HTA-154, left mandible with m2-m3: A. occlusal view; B. interpretive drawing; C. lingual view; D. buccal view. Scale bar equals 1 cm. See Fig. 2 for abbreviations
Specimen | Taxon | Body mass (m1 area) | Body mass (m2 length) | Body mass (M2 length) | Body mass (M1 area) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTA-8 | P. hysudricus | 94.5 | 96.6 | ||
HTA-126b | P. hysudricus | 194.4 | 202.9 | ||
HTA-141 | P. hysudricus | 135.6 | 175.7 | ||
GSI 18082 | P. hysudricus | 114 | |||
HTA-140a | P. hysudricus | 119.8 | |||
HTA-140b | P. hysudricus | 118.2 | |||
HTA-42b | P. hysudricus | 123.3 | |||
HTA-126a | P. hysudricus | 67.9 | |||
GSI 18078 | Y. dangari | 60.5 | |||
GSI K15/247+249 | Y. dangari | 73.7 | 108.9 | ||
GSI Htu | Y. dangari | 107.2 | |||
HTA-154 | Y. dangari | 126.9 |
Table 3 Estimated body masses for the Haritalyangar suoids based on regressions of Legendre (1989) and Damuth (1990) (kg)
Specimen | Taxon | Body mass (m1 area) | Body mass (m2 length) | Body mass (M2 length) | Body mass (M1 area) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTA-8 | P. hysudricus | 94.5 | 96.6 | ||
HTA-126b | P. hysudricus | 194.4 | 202.9 | ||
HTA-141 | P. hysudricus | 135.6 | 175.7 | ||
GSI 18082 | P. hysudricus | 114 | |||
HTA-140a | P. hysudricus | 119.8 | |||
HTA-140b | P. hysudricus | 118.2 | |||
HTA-42b | P. hysudricus | 123.3 | |||
HTA-126a | P. hysudricus | 67.9 | |||
GSI 18078 | Y. dangari | 60.5 | |||
GSI K15/247+249 | Y. dangari | 73.7 | 108.9 | ||
GSI Htu | Y. dangari | 107.2 | |||
HTA-154 | Y. dangari | 126.9 |
[1] | Barry J C, Morgan M E, Flynn L J et al., 2002. Faunal and environmental change in the Late Miocene Siwaliks of northern Pakistan. Paleobiol Mem, 3: 1-72 |
[2] | Batool A, Khan M A, Qureshi N A, 2015. New fossils of Suidae (Mammalia: Artiodactyla) from the Hasnot Late Miocene, northern Pakistan. J Anim Plant Sci, 25: 578-590 |
[3] |
Brozovic N, Burbank D W, 2000. Dynamic fluvial systems and gravel progradation in the Himalayan foreland. Geol Soc Am Bull, 112: 394-412
DOI URL |
[4] |
Chaimanee Y, Suteethorn V, Jintasakul et al., 2004. A new orang-utan relative from the Late Miocene of Thailand. Nature, 427: 439-441
DOI |
[5] | Chavasseau O, Khyaw A A, Chaimanee Y et al., 2013. Advances in the biochronology and biostratigraphy of the continental Neogene of Myanmar. In: Wang X M, Flynn L J, Fortelius M eds. Fossil Mammals of Asia. Neogene Biostratigraphy and Chronology. New York: Columbia University Press. 461-474 |
[6] |
Chopra S R K, Kaul S, 1979. A new species of Pliopithecus from the Indian Sivaliks. J Hum Evol, 8: 475-477
DOI URL |
[7] | Colbert E H, 1935. Siwalik mammals in the American Museum of Natural History. Trans Am Philos Soc, New Ser, 26: 1-401 |
[8] | Damuth J, 1990. Problems in estimating body masses of archaic ungulates using dental measurements. In: Damuth J, MacFadden B eds. Body Size in Mammalian Paleobiology: Estimation and Biological Implications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 229-253 |
[9] | Dar F Y, Aftab K, Babar M A et al., 2019. New fossils of Suidae (Mammalia) from Dhok Pathan Formation of Siwaliks Punjab, Pakistan. J Anim Plant Sci, 29: 1198-1203 |
[10] | Falconer H, 1868. Palaeontological Memoirs and Notes of the Late Hugh Falconer; with a Biographical Sketch of the Author. Vol. 1. Fauna Antiqua Sivalensis. London: Robert Hardwicke. 1-556 |
[11] | Falconer H, Cautley P T, 1846. Fauna Antiqua Sivalensis, Being the Fossil Zoology of the Sewalik Hills, in the North of India. London: Smith, Elder. 1-64 |
[12] | Gray J E, 1821. On the natural arrangement of vertebrose animals. Lond Med Rep, 15: 296-310 |
[13] | Han D F, 1983. A new species of Lophochoerus from Lufeng. Acta Anthropol Sin, 2: 22-26 |
[14] |
Jaeger J J, Soe A N, Chavasseau O et al., 2011. First hominoid from the Late Miocene of the Irrawaddy Formation (Myanmar). PLoS One, 6: e17065
DOI URL |
[15] |
Johnson N M, Opdyke N D, Johnson G D et al., 1982. Magnetic polarity stratigraphy and ages of Siwalik Group rocks of the Potwar Plateau, Pakistan. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol, 37: 17-42
DOI URL |
[16] |
Johnson G D, Opdyke N D, Tandon S K et al., 1983. The magnetic polarity stratigraphy of the Siwalik Group at Haritalyangar (India) and a new last appearance datum for Ramapithecus and Sivapithecus in Asia. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol, 44: 223-249
DOI URL |
[17] | Khan M A, Iqbal M, Nayyer A Q et al., 2013. Tetraconodon (Mammalia, Artiodactyla, Suidae) from the Late Miocene Dhok Pathan Formation of Pakistan. Pakistan J Zool, 45: 975-980 |
[18] | Legendre S, 1989. Les communautés de mammifères du Paléogène (Eocène supérieur et Oligocène) d'Europe Occidentale: structures, milieux et évolution. Münchner Geowiss Abh, 16: 1-110 |
[19] | Lewis G E, 1934. Preliminary notice of a new species of Hippohyus from India. Am J Sci, 27: 457-459 |
[20] | Liu L P, 2003. Chinese Fossil Suoidea Systematics, Evolution, and Paleoecology. Helsinki: Helsinki University Printing House. 1-40 |
[21] | Lydekker R, 1877. Notices of new and rare mammals from the Siwaliks. Rec Geol Surv India, 10: 76-83 |
[22] | Lydekker R, 1884. Indian Tertiary and post-Tertiary Vertebrata. Siwalik and Narbada bunodont Suina. Mem Geol Surv India, Palaeontol Indica, 3(10): 35-104 |
[23] | Made J van der, 1997. Systematics and stratigraphy of the genus Taucanamo and Schizochoerus and a classification of the Palaeochoeridae (Suoidea, Mammalia). Proc K Ned Akad Wet, 100: 127-139 |
[24] |
Made J van der, 1999. Biometrical trends in the Tetraconodontinae, a subfamily of pigs. Trans R Soc Edinburgh Earth Sci, 89: 199-225
DOI URL |
[25] | Made J van der, 2020. The Suoidea from the Middle Miocene of Gračanica (Bugojno Basin, Bosnia and Herzegovina) -evolution, taxononomy, and biostratigraphy. Palaeobiodiv Palaeoenv, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12549-020-00420-9 |
[26] | Made J van der, Han D F, 1994. Suoidea from the upper Miocene hominoid locality of Lufeng, Yunnan Province, China. Proc K Ned Akad Wet, 97: 27-82 |
[27] | Made J van der, Krakhmalnaya T, Kubiak H, 1999. The pig Propotamochoerus palaeochoerus from the upper Miocene of Grytsiv, Ukraine. Estud Geol, 55: 283-292 |
[28] | Nanda A C, 1982. Two rare fossil suids from the Tatrot Formation, Ambala, India. Geol Surv India Misc Pub, 41: 16-22 |
[29] | Nelson S V, 2003. The Extinction of Sivapithecus. Faunal and Environmental Changes Surrounding the Disappearance of a Miocene Hominoid in the Siwaliks of Pakistan. Boston/Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers. 1-138 |
[30] |
Orliac M J, Antoine P O, Ducrocq S, 2010. Phylogenetic relationships of the Suidae (Mammalia, Cetartiodactyla): new insights on the relationships within Suoidea. Zool Scr, 39: 315-330
DOI URL |
[31] | Orliac M J, Karadenizli L, Antoine P O et al., 2015. Small hyotheriine suids (Mammalia, Artiodactyla) from the late Early Miocene of Turkey and a short overview of early Miocene small suoids in the Old World. Palaeontol Electron, 18.2. 30A: 1-18 |
[32] | Pan Y R, Liu J H, Dong W, 2006. Artiodactyla. In: Qi G Q, Dong W eds. Lufengpithecus hudienensis Site. Beijing: Science Press. 195-228 |
[33] | Pickford M, 1976. A new species of Taucanamo (Mammalia: Artiodactyla) from the Siwaliks of the Potwar plateau, Pakistan. Pakistan J Zool, 8: 13-20 |
[34] | Pickford M, 1988. Revision of the Miocene Suidae of the Indian subcontinent. Münchner Geowiss Abh Reihe A, 12: 1-98 |
[35] |
Pickford M, 2011. Small suoids from the Miocene of Europe and Asia. Estud Geol, 67: 541-578
DOI URL |
[36] |
Pilbeam D R, Barry J C, Meyer G E et al., 1977a. Geology and palaeontology of Neogene strata of Pakistan. Nature, 270: 684-689
DOI |
[37] |
Pilbeam D R, Meyer G E, Badgley C et al., 1977b. New hominoid primates from Siwaliks of Pakistan and their bearing on hominoid evolution. Nature, 270: 689-695
DOI |
[38] | Pilbeam D R, Rose M D, Badgley C et al., 1980. Miocene hominoids from Pakistan. Postilla, 181: 1-94 |
[39] | Pilgrim G E, 1925. Presidential address to the geological section of the 12th Indian Science Congress. Proc 12th Indian Sci Congr. 200-218 |
[40] | Pilgrim G E, 1926. The fossil Suidae of India. Mem Geol Surv India, New Ser, 8: 1-68 |
[41] |
Pillans B, Williams M, Cameron D et al., 2005. Revised correlation of the Haritalyangar magnetostratigraphy, Indian Siwaliks: implication for the age of the Miocene hominoids Indopithecus and Sivapithecus, with a note on a new hominid tooth. J Hum Evol, 48: 507-515
PMID |
[42] | Prasad K N, 1970. The vertebrate fauna from the Siwalik beds of Haritalyangar, Himachal Pradesh. Palaeontol Indica, 39: 1-79 |
[43] |
Sankhyan A R, 1985. Late occurrence of Sivapithecus in Indian Siwaliks. J Hum Evol, 14: 573-578
DOI URL |
[44] | Sankhyan A R, Čerňanský A, 2016. A first possible chameleon from the Late Miocene of India (the hominoid site of Haritalyangar): a tentative evidence for an Asian dispersal of chameleons. Sci Nat, 103: 94-100, doi: 10.1007/s00114-016-1419-3 |
[45] | Sankhyan A R, Chavasseau O, 2018. New proboscidean fossils from Middle Siwaliks of Haritalyangar area, Himachal Pradesh, India. Palaeontol Electron, 21.1.15A, doi: 10.26879/844palaeo-electronica.org/content/2018/2200-haritalyangar-proboscideans |
[46] |
Sankhyan A R, Kelley J, Harrison T, 2017. A highly derived pliopithecoid from the Late Miocene of Haritalyangar, India. J Hum Evol, 105: 1-12, doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.01.010
PMID |
[47] | Sein C, Made J van der, Rössner G, 2009. New material of Propotamochoerus (Suidae, Mammalia) from the Irrawaddy Formation, Myanmar. Neues Jahrb Geol Paläontol Abh, 251: 17-31 |
[48] | Stehlin H G, 1899-1900. Uber die Geschichte des Suiden-Gebisses. Abh Schweiz Paläontol Ges, 26-27: 1-527 |
[49] |
Tauxe L, Opdyke N D, 1982. A time framework based on magnetostratigraphy for the Siwalik sediments of the Khaur area, northern Pakistan. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol, 37: 43-61
DOI URL |
[50] | Vasishat R N, 1985. Antecedents of Early Man in Northwestern India: Paleontological and Paleoecological Evidences. New Delhi: Inter-India Publications. 1-230 |
[1] | 穆罕默德·伊利亚斯, 李强, 史勤勤, 倪喜军. 欧亚大陆晚中新世 “麝牛类” 牛科动物. 古脊椎动物学报, 2024, 62(4): 262-290. |
[2] | 劳伦斯J.弗林, 李强, 吉学平, 王晓鸣. 云南晚中新世一巨型竹鼠. 古脊椎动物学报, 2023, 61(4): 277-283. |
[3] | 王伴月. 副竹鼠(拟速掘鼠亚科,鼠超科)一新种在甘肃临夏盆地的发现. 古脊椎动物学报, 2022, 60(4): 271-277. |
[4] | Henry GALIANO, 曾志杰, Nikos SOLOUNIAS, 王晓鸣, 邱占祥, Stuart C. WHITE. 甘肃临夏盆地中新世鬣狗科一新属新种. 古脊椎动物学报, 2022, 60(2): 81-116. |
[5] | 张晓晓, 孙丹辉. 甘肃庆阳晚中新世板齿犀类的骰骨材料及其形态学意义. 古脊椎动物学报, 2022, 60(1): 29-41. |
[6] | 王倩, 刘艳, 王李花, 傅明楷, 张兆群. 内蒙古韩家营玄武岩夹层中三趾马动物群化石. 古脊椎动物学报, 2021, 59(2): 125-137. |
[7] | 张立民, 董为, 倪喜军, 李强. 晚中新世晚期土城子小哺乳动物组合及土城子动物群在内蒙古中部地区新近纪哺乳动物群序列中的位置. 古脊椎动物学报, 2021, 59(1): 45-63. |
[8] | 王伴月, 邱占祥. 豪猪化石在临夏盆地的新发现. 古脊椎动物学报, 2020, 58(3): 204-220. |
[9] | 王伴月, 邱占祥, 李绿洲. 甘肃和政晚中新世许氏鼠(啮齿类:鼠科)头骨化石. 古脊椎动物学报, 2020, 58(2): 120-133. |
[10] | 熊武阳. 陕西府谷晚中新世巨鬣狗(Dinocrocuta gigantea)(食肉目:鬣狗科)颅基部形态研究. 古脊椎动物学报, 2019, 57(4): 274-307. |
[11] | 陈 鹤,王世骐,陶大卫,夏秀敏,陈善勤,吴 妍. 晚中新世甘肃黑犀(Diceros gansuensis)的食性——基于牙结石淀粉粒证据. 古脊椎动物学报, 2018, 56(4): 343-353. |
[12] | 孙丹辉, 李 雨, 邓 涛. 甘肃庆阳晚中新世大唇犀属(奇蹄目,犀科)一新种. 古脊椎动物学报, 2018, 56(3): 216-228. |
[13] | 董 为, 刘文晖, 张立民, 白炜鹏, 蔡保全. 内蒙古化德土城子地点晚中新世麝科化石新材料. 古脊椎动物学报, 2018, 56(3): 229-247. |
[14] | 董 为,刘文晖,张立民,蔡保全. 内蒙古化德土城子地点晚中新世鹿科化石新材料. 古脊椎动物学报, 2018, 56(2): 157-175. |
[15] | 邓 涛,张云翔,曾志杰,侯素宽. 记恐剑齿虎一头骨及剑齿虎镶嵌进化中体型巨大化的新证据. 古脊椎动物学报, 2016, 54(4): 302-318. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||