Vertebrata Palasiatica ›› 2023, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (1): 43-70.DOI: 10.19615/j.cnki.2096-9899.221123
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2022-09-15
Online:
2023-01-20
Published:
2023-01-11
Contact:
* liqian@ivpp.ac.cn基金资助:
CLC Number:
LI Qi, LI Qian. The Sharamurunian rodent fauna in the Erlian Basin, Nei Mongol, China. Vertebrata Palasiatica, 2023, 61(1): 43-70.
李琪, 李茜. 2023, 61(1): 43-70, 内蒙古二连盆地沙拉木伦期啮齿类动物群研究. 古脊椎动物学报.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.vertpala.ac.cn/EN/10.19615/j.cnki.2096-9899.221123
Fig. 1 Stratigraphy section of Ula Usu A. the Paleogene outcrop at Ula Usu; B. stratigraphic section of the studied sediment series at Ula Usu The area circled by the red dotted line in the A-graph is the strata where new rodent fossils were collected, which was produced in between 30 and 10 m of the stratigraphic column in the B-graph
P. ulausuensis sp. nov. | Proardynomys sp. | P. borkhoii | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Li, | Dashzeveg and Meng, | ||||||
V28608 | V26554.1-5 | PSS 41-30 | PSS 41-29 | ||||
p4 | L | 3.75 | 4.10 | ||||
W | 3.40 | 3.00 | |||||
m1 | L | 3.05 | 3.20-3.30 | 3.82 | 3.54 | ||
W | 3.10 | 3.20-3.50 | 3.44 | 3.00 | |||
m2 | L | 3.50 | 3.20-3.50 | 4.10 | 3.70 | ||
W | 3.25 | 3.50 | 3.46 | 3.14 | |||
m3 | L | 4.00 | 4.60 | 4.36 | |||
W | 3.35 | 3.50 | 3.45 |
Table 1 Measurements of lower cheek teeth of Proardynomys (mm)
P. ulausuensis sp. nov. | Proardynomys sp. | P. borkhoii | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Li, | Dashzeveg and Meng, | ||||||
V28608 | V26554.1-5 | PSS 41-30 | PSS 41-29 | ||||
p4 | L | 3.75 | 4.10 | ||||
W | 3.40 | 3.00 | |||||
m1 | L | 3.05 | 3.20-3.30 | 3.82 | 3.54 | ||
W | 3.10 | 3.20-3.50 | 3.44 | 3.00 | |||
m2 | L | 3.50 | 3.20-3.50 | 4.10 | 3.70 | ||
W | 3.25 | 3.50 | 3.46 | 3.14 | |||
m3 | L | 4.00 | 4.60 | 4.36 | |||
W | 3.35 | 3.50 | 3.45 |
n | L | Mean | W | Mean | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P4 | 2 | 3.40-3.60 | 3.50 | 3.95 | 3.95 |
M1 | 7 | 3.20-3.65 | 3.39 | 3.10-4.60 | 3.76 |
M2 | 9 | 3.20-3.75 | 3.46 | 3.70-4.40 | 4.00 |
M3 | 1 | 3.10 | 3.10 | 3.80 | 3.80 |
m1 | 3 | 3.60-3.90 | 3.73 | 3.10-3.40 | 3.23 |
m2 | 4 | 3.60-4.00 | 3.90 | 3.70-3.90 | 3.76 |
m3 | 2 | 4.90-5.00 | 4.95 | 3.90-4.30 | 4.10 |
Table 2 Measurements of teeth of Yuomys cavioides from Ula Usu (mm)
n | L | Mean | W | Mean | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P4 | 2 | 3.40-3.60 | 3.50 | 3.95 | 3.95 |
M1 | 7 | 3.20-3.65 | 3.39 | 3.10-4.60 | 3.76 |
M2 | 9 | 3.20-3.75 | 3.46 | 3.70-4.40 | 4.00 |
M3 | 1 | 3.10 | 3.10 | 3.80 | 3.80 |
m1 | 3 | 3.60-3.90 | 3.73 | 3.10-3.40 | 3.23 |
m2 | 4 | 3.60-4.00 | 3.90 | 3.70-3.90 | 3.76 |
m3 | 2 | 4.90-5.00 | 4.95 | 3.90-4.30 | 4.10 |
Fig. 3 Cheek teeth of Yuomys cavioides from Ula Usu, Erlian Basin A. IVPP V28604.2, left maxilla with P3-M3; B. V28604.16, left m1; C. V28604.6, left mandible with m2-3
V28605.1-33 | V23903.1-44 | V12518.1-34 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Li, | Wang, | |||||||||||
n | Range | Mean | n | Range | Mean | n | Range | Mean | ||||
M1 | L | 1 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 13 | 1.60-1.95 | 1.73 | 7 | 1.53-1.94 | 1.82 | ||
W | 2 | 1.63-1.77 | 1.70 | 13 | 1.70-2.05 | 1.82 | 7 | 1.70-2.18 | 1.95 | |||
M2 | L | 5 | 1.22-1.60 | 1.49 | 8 | 1.75-2.05 | 1.89 | 10 | 1.85-2.30 | 2.06 | ||
W | 5 | 1.33-1.73 | 1.55 | 8 | 1.95-2.15 | 2.06 | 9 | 2.00-2.46 | 2.17 | |||
M3 | L | 2 | 1.40-1.60 | 1.50 | 8 | 1.85-2.10 | 2.00 | 5 | 2.05-2.28 | 2.19 | ||
W | 2 | 1.45-1.50 | 1.48 | 8 | 1.95-2.25 | 2.01 | 5 | 1.90-2.20 | 2.08 | |||
P4 | L | 2 | 1.13-1.20 | 1.17 | 1 | 1.30 | 1.30 | 2 | 1.13-1.17 | 1.15 | ||
W | 2 | 0.93-1.00 | 0.97 | 1 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
m1 | L | 7 | 1.22-1.40 | 1.30 | 7 | 1.50-1.75 | 1.65 | 7 | 1.50-1.90 | 1.74 | ||
W | 7 | 1.00-1.20 | 1.11 | 7 | 1.34-1.45 | 1.40 | 7 | 1.30-1.63 | 1.47 | |||
m2 | L | 4 | 1.53-1.87 | 1.71 | 7 | 1.80-2.00 | 1.91 | 12 | 1.80-2.45 | 2.04 | ||
W | 4 | 1.30-1.62 | 1.52 | 7 | 1.65-1.75 | 1.72 | 14 | 1.53-2.10 | 1.81 | |||
m3 | L | 11 | 1.42-1.83 | 1.54 | 11 | 1.80-2.35 | 2.12 | 5 | 1.91-2.20 | 2.11 | ||
W | 9 | 1.07-1.45 | 1.23 | 11 | 1.55-1.90 | 1.71 | 5 | 1.42-1.83 | 1.62 |
Table 3 Measurements of cheek teeth of Gobiomys neimongolensis (mm)
V28605.1-33 | V23903.1-44 | V12518.1-34 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Li, | Wang, | |||||||||||
n | Range | Mean | n | Range | Mean | n | Range | Mean | ||||
M1 | L | 1 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 13 | 1.60-1.95 | 1.73 | 7 | 1.53-1.94 | 1.82 | ||
W | 2 | 1.63-1.77 | 1.70 | 13 | 1.70-2.05 | 1.82 | 7 | 1.70-2.18 | 1.95 | |||
M2 | L | 5 | 1.22-1.60 | 1.49 | 8 | 1.75-2.05 | 1.89 | 10 | 1.85-2.30 | 2.06 | ||
W | 5 | 1.33-1.73 | 1.55 | 8 | 1.95-2.15 | 2.06 | 9 | 2.00-2.46 | 2.17 | |||
M3 | L | 2 | 1.40-1.60 | 1.50 | 8 | 1.85-2.10 | 2.00 | 5 | 2.05-2.28 | 2.19 | ||
W | 2 | 1.45-1.50 | 1.48 | 8 | 1.95-2.25 | 2.01 | 5 | 1.90-2.20 | 2.08 | |||
P4 | L | 2 | 1.13-1.20 | 1.17 | 1 | 1.30 | 1.30 | 2 | 1.13-1.17 | 1.15 | ||
W | 2 | 0.93-1.00 | 0.97 | 1 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
m1 | L | 7 | 1.22-1.40 | 1.30 | 7 | 1.50-1.75 | 1.65 | 7 | 1.50-1.90 | 1.74 | ||
W | 7 | 1.00-1.20 | 1.11 | 7 | 1.34-1.45 | 1.40 | 7 | 1.30-1.63 | 1.47 | |||
m2 | L | 4 | 1.53-1.87 | 1.71 | 7 | 1.80-2.00 | 1.91 | 12 | 1.80-2.45 | 2.04 | ||
W | 4 | 1.30-1.62 | 1.52 | 7 | 1.65-1.75 | 1.72 | 14 | 1.53-2.10 | 1.81 | |||
m3 | L | 11 | 1.42-1.83 | 1.54 | 11 | 1.80-2.35 | 2.12 | 5 | 1.91-2.20 | 2.11 | ||
W | 9 | 1.07-1.45 | 1.23 | 11 | 1.55-1.90 | 1.71 | 5 | 1.42-1.83 | 1.62 |
Fig. 5 Cheek teeth of Gobiomys neimongolensis from Ula Usu, Erlian Basin A. IVPP V28605.3, left M2; B. V28605.10, left p4; C. V28605.12, left m1;D. V28605.21, right m2 (reversed); E. V28605.23, left m3
V28606.1-36 | V23902.1-36 | V12521.1-7 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Li, | Wang, | |||||||||||
n | Range | Mean | n | Range | Mean | n | Range | Mean | ||||
P4 | L | 1 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 5 | 0.05-0.85 | 0.74 | 3 | 0.67-0.8 | 0.72 | ||
W | 1 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 5 | 0.65-1.2 | 1.02 | 3 | 0.92-1.10 | 0.99 | |||
M1 | L | 6 | 1.06-1.20 | 1.12 | 13 | 0.85-1.45 | 1.15 | 4 | 1.00-1.60 | 1.08 | ||
W | 6 | 1.10-1.20 | 1.14 | 13 | 0.95-1.45 | 1.20 | 4 | 1.0-1.20 | 1.08 | |||
M2 | L | 2 | 1.16-1.18 | 1.17 | 13 | 1.05-1.50 | 1.30 | 5 | 1.20-1.38 | 1.29 | ||
W | 2 | 1.24-1.30 | 1.27 | 13 | 1.10-1.70 | 1.42 | 5 | 1.20-1.40 | 1.33 | |||
M3 | L | 13 | 1.15-1.40 | 1.25 | 7 | 1.05-1.45 | 1.24 | 3 | 1.22-1.50 | 1.34 | ||
W | 13 | 1.21-1.36 | 1.28 | 7 | 1.00-1.50 | 1.24 | 3 | 1.23-1.53 | 1.35 | |||
m1 | L | 5 | 1.15-1.24 | 1.19 | 6 | 1.05-1.45 | 1.21 | 1 | 1.27 | 1.27 | ||
W | 5 | 1.00-1.10 | 1.04 | 6 | 0.90-1.15 | 1.03 | 1 | 1.20 | 1.20 | |||
m2 | L | 5 | 1.20-1.30 | 1.26 | 7 | 1.10-1.55 | 1.32 | 1 | 1.34 | 1.34 | ||
W | 5 | 1.08-1.20 | 1.15 | 7 | 1.10-1.40 | 1.24 | 1 | 1.22 | 1.22 | |||
m3 | L | 3 | 1.30-1.44 | 1.36 | 5 | 1.20-1.65 | 1.40 | |||||
W | 3 | 1.04-1.20 | 1.13 | 5 | 0.90-1.30 | 1.10 |
Table 4 Measurements of cheek teeth of Gobiomys exiguus (mm)
V28606.1-36 | V23902.1-36 | V12521.1-7 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Li, | Wang, | |||||||||||
n | Range | Mean | n | Range | Mean | n | Range | Mean | ||||
P4 | L | 1 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 5 | 0.05-0.85 | 0.74 | 3 | 0.67-0.8 | 0.72 | ||
W | 1 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 5 | 0.65-1.2 | 1.02 | 3 | 0.92-1.10 | 0.99 | |||
M1 | L | 6 | 1.06-1.20 | 1.12 | 13 | 0.85-1.45 | 1.15 | 4 | 1.00-1.60 | 1.08 | ||
W | 6 | 1.10-1.20 | 1.14 | 13 | 0.95-1.45 | 1.20 | 4 | 1.0-1.20 | 1.08 | |||
M2 | L | 2 | 1.16-1.18 | 1.17 | 13 | 1.05-1.50 | 1.30 | 5 | 1.20-1.38 | 1.29 | ||
W | 2 | 1.24-1.30 | 1.27 | 13 | 1.10-1.70 | 1.42 | 5 | 1.20-1.40 | 1.33 | |||
M3 | L | 13 | 1.15-1.40 | 1.25 | 7 | 1.05-1.45 | 1.24 | 3 | 1.22-1.50 | 1.34 | ||
W | 13 | 1.21-1.36 | 1.28 | 7 | 1.00-1.50 | 1.24 | 3 | 1.23-1.53 | 1.35 | |||
m1 | L | 5 | 1.15-1.24 | 1.19 | 6 | 1.05-1.45 | 1.21 | 1 | 1.27 | 1.27 | ||
W | 5 | 1.00-1.10 | 1.04 | 6 | 0.90-1.15 | 1.03 | 1 | 1.20 | 1.20 | |||
m2 | L | 5 | 1.20-1.30 | 1.26 | 7 | 1.10-1.55 | 1.32 | 1 | 1.34 | 1.34 | ||
W | 5 | 1.08-1.20 | 1.15 | 7 | 1.10-1.40 | 1.24 | 1 | 1.22 | 1.22 | |||
m3 | L | 3 | 1.30-1.44 | 1.36 | 5 | 1.20-1.65 | 1.40 | |||||
W | 3 | 1.04-1.20 | 1.13 | 5 | 0.90-1.30 | 1.10 |
Fig. 6 Cheek teeth of Gobiomys exiguus from Ula Usu, Erlian Basin A. IVPP V28606.1, right P4 (reversed); B. V28606.5, right M1 (reversed); C. V28606.8, left M2;D. V28606.11, left M3; E. V28606.25, left m1; F. V28606.35, left m3
V 28607.1-8 | V 12524.1-5 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wang, | ||||||||
n | Range | Mean | n | Range | Mean | |||
P4 | L | 1 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 1 | 0.95 | 0.95 | |
W | 1 | 1.28 | 1.28 | 1 | 1.40 | 1.40 | ||
M2 | L | 7 | 1.20-1.56 | 1.30 | 1 | 1.53 | 1.53 | |
W | 7 | 1.20-1.58 | 1.37 | 1 | 1.77 | 1.77 |
Table 5 Measurements of the cheek teeth of Gobiomys asiaticus (mm)
V 28607.1-8 | V 12524.1-5 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wang, | ||||||||
n | Range | Mean | n | Range | Mean | |||
P4 | L | 1 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 1 | 0.95 | 0.95 | |
W | 1 | 1.28 | 1.28 | 1 | 1.40 | 1.40 | ||
M2 | L | 7 | 1.20-1.56 | 1.30 | 1 | 1.53 | 1.53 | |
W | 7 | 1.20-1.58 | 1.37 | 1 | 1.77 | 1.77 |
Fig. 8 Mandible and cheek teeth of Pappocricetodon rencunensis from Ula Usu, Erlian Basin A-C. IVPP V28610.1, the right mandible with m2-3 (reversed) in occlusal (A), lingual (B), and labial (C) views; D. V28610.2, left M1; E. V28610.11, left M2; F. V28610.19, right M3 (reversed); G. V28610.20, left m1; H. V28610.37, right m2 (reversed); I. V28610.42, left m3
V28610.1-42 | V10288.1-378 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tong, | ||||||||
n | Range | Mean | n | Range | Mean | |||
M1 | L | 8 | 1.35-1.62 | 1.46 | 62 | 1.30-1.65 | 1.47 | |
W | 8 | 1.13-1.25 | 1.17 | 62 | 0.95-1.25 | 1.23 | ||
M2 | L | 9 | 1.22-1.40 | 1.31 | 76 | 1.10-1.50 | 1.34 | |
W | 8 | 1.04-1.27 | 1.18 | 74 | 1.00-1.33 | 1.20 | ||
M3 | L | 1 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 56 | 0.95-1.25 | 1.10 | |
W | 1 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 58 | 1.00-1.25 | 1.11 | ||
m1 | L | 16 | 0.98-1.35 | 1.17 | 50 | 1.15-1.45 | 1.31 | |
W | 14 | 0.71-1.02 | 0.87 | 51 | 0.85-1.10 | 0.97 | ||
m2 | L | 3 | 1.24-1.33 | 1.29 | 53 | 1.20-1.57 | 1.41 | |
W | 3 | 1.02-1.10 | 1.06 | 53 | 0.95-1.25 | 1.10 | ||
m3 | L | 4 | 1.29-1.36 | 1.32 | 42 | 1.20-1.50 | 1.40 | |
W | 4 | 1.00-1.15 | 1.07 | 41 | 0.95-1.20 | 1.10 |
Table 6 Measurements of molars of Pappocricetodon rencunensis (mm)
V28610.1-42 | V10288.1-378 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tong, | ||||||||
n | Range | Mean | n | Range | Mean | |||
M1 | L | 8 | 1.35-1.62 | 1.46 | 62 | 1.30-1.65 | 1.47 | |
W | 8 | 1.13-1.25 | 1.17 | 62 | 0.95-1.25 | 1.23 | ||
M2 | L | 9 | 1.22-1.40 | 1.31 | 76 | 1.10-1.50 | 1.34 | |
W | 8 | 1.04-1.27 | 1.18 | 74 | 1.00-1.33 | 1.20 | ||
M3 | L | 1 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 56 | 0.95-1.25 | 1.10 | |
W | 1 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 58 | 1.00-1.25 | 1.11 | ||
m1 | L | 16 | 0.98-1.35 | 1.17 | 50 | 1.15-1.45 | 1.31 | |
W | 14 | 0.71-1.02 | 0.87 | 51 | 0.85-1.10 | 0.97 | ||
m2 | L | 3 | 1.24-1.33 | 1.29 | 53 | 1.20-1.57 | 1.41 | |
W | 3 | 1.02-1.10 | 1.06 | 53 | 0.95-1.25 | 1.10 | ||
m3 | L | 4 | 1.29-1.36 | 1.32 | 42 | 1.20-1.50 | 1.40 | |
W | 4 | 1.00-1.15 | 1.07 | 41 | 0.95-1.20 | 1.10 |
Fig. 9 Selected molars of Allosminthus uniconjugatus from Ula Usu, Erlian Basin A. IVPP V28611.5, right M1 (reversed); B. V28611.10, right M3 (reversed); C. V28611.12, left m1; D. V28611.15, left m2; E. V28611.35, right m3 (reversed)
V28611.1-35 | V10298.1-17 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tong, | ||||||||
n | Range | Mean | n | Range | Mean | |||
M1 | L | 6 | 0.93-1.07 | 1.01 | 2 | 1.13-1.20 | 1.17 | |
W | 5 | 0.75-0.95 | 0.88 | 2 | 0.97-1.03 | 1.00 | ||
M2 | L | 2 | 0.95-0.97 | 0.96 | 3 | 1.03-1.10 | 1.07 | |
W | 2 | 0.80-0.87 | 0.84 | 3 | 0.95-1.00 | 0.97 | ||
M3 | L | 2 | 0.85-0.87 | 0.86 | 2 | 0.83 | 0.83 | |
W | 2 | 0.81-0.84 | 0.83 | 2 | 0.83-0.87 | 0.85 | ||
m1 | L | 3 | 0.96-1.04 | 1.00 | 2 | 1.07-1.10 | 1.09 | |
W | 3 | 0.78-0.84 | 0.80 | 2 | 0.84-0.87 | 0.86 | ||
m2 | L | 18 | 1.02-1.20 | 1.13 | 3 | 1.03-1.10 | 1.07 | |
W | 18 | 0.80-0.95 | 0.88 | 2 | 0.80-0.87 | 0.84 | ||
m3 | L | 4 | 0.94-1.02 | 0.96 | 3 | 0.97-1.03 | 1.01 | |
W | 4 | 0.75-0.87 | 0.80 | 3 | 0.88-0.90 | 0.89 |
Table 7 Measurements of molars of Allosminthus uniconjugatus (mm)
V28611.1-35 | V10298.1-17 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tong, | ||||||||
n | Range | Mean | n | Range | Mean | |||
M1 | L | 6 | 0.93-1.07 | 1.01 | 2 | 1.13-1.20 | 1.17 | |
W | 5 | 0.75-0.95 | 0.88 | 2 | 0.97-1.03 | 1.00 | ||
M2 | L | 2 | 0.95-0.97 | 0.96 | 3 | 1.03-1.10 | 1.07 | |
W | 2 | 0.80-0.87 | 0.84 | 3 | 0.95-1.00 | 0.97 | ||
M3 | L | 2 | 0.85-0.87 | 0.86 | 2 | 0.83 | 0.83 | |
W | 2 | 0.81-0.84 | 0.83 | 2 | 0.83-0.87 | 0.85 | ||
m1 | L | 3 | 0.96-1.04 | 1.00 | 2 | 1.07-1.10 | 1.09 | |
W | 3 | 0.78-0.84 | 0.80 | 2 | 0.84-0.87 | 0.86 | ||
m2 | L | 18 | 1.02-1.20 | 1.13 | 3 | 1.03-1.10 | 1.07 | |
W | 18 | 0.80-0.95 | 0.88 | 2 | 0.80-0.87 | 0.84 | ||
m3 | L | 4 | 0.94-1.02 | 0.96 | 3 | 0.97-1.03 | 1.01 | |
W | 4 | 0.75-0.87 | 0.80 | 3 | 0.88-0.90 | 0.89 |
V28612.1-17 | V10295.1-15 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tong, | ||||||||
n | Range | Mean | n | Range | Mean | |||
M1 | L | 5 | 0.99-1.07 | 1.05 | 2 | 0.90-1.00 | 0.95 | |
W | 5 | 0.86-0.98 | 0.93 | 2 | 0.75-0.90 | 0.83 | ||
M2 | L | 12 | 0.91-1.18 | 1.06 | 7 | 0.95-1.00 | 0.97 | |
W | 12 | 0.85-1.11 | 0.99 | 7 | 0.90-0.95 | 0.91 |
Table 8 Measurements of molars of Primisminthus shanghenus (mm)
V28612.1-17 | V10295.1-15 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tong, | ||||||||
n | Range | Mean | n | Range | Mean | |||
M1 | L | 5 | 0.99-1.07 | 1.05 | 2 | 0.90-1.00 | 0.95 | |
W | 5 | 0.86-0.98 | 0.93 | 2 | 0.75-0.90 | 0.83 | ||
M2 | L | 12 | 0.91-1.18 | 1.06 | 7 | 0.95-1.00 | 0.97 | |
W | 12 | 0.85-1.11 | 0.99 | 7 | 0.90-0.95 | 0.91 |
Fig. 11 Cheek teeth of Hulgana cf. H. ertnia from Ula Usu, Erlian Basin A. IVPP V28609.1, right P4 (reversed); B. V28609.3, left M1; C. V28609.12, left M2; D. V28609.13, left M3;E. V28609.14, right dp4 (reversed); F. V28609.15, left p4; G. V28609.20, right m1 (reversed);H. V28609.21, right m2 (reversed); I. V28609.23, right m3 (reversed)
Hulgana cf. H. ertnia | H. ertnia | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
V28609.1-23 | AMNH 26085-26088 | |||||||
Dawson, | ||||||||
n | Range | Mean | n | Range | Mean | |||
P4 | L | 1 | 3.15 | 3.15 | 2 | 3.50-3.90 | 3.70 | |
W | 1 | 3.85 | 3.85 | 2 | 4.60-4.80 | 4.70 | ||
M1 | L | 7 | 3.40-3.70 | 3.53 | 2 | 4.10-4.40 | 4.25 | |
W | 7 | 3.75-4.75 | 4.14 | 2 | 4.80 | 4.80 | ||
M2 | L | 2 | 3.35-3.55 | 3.45 | 2 | 3.70-3.90 | 3.80 | |
W | 1 | 4.45 | 4.45 | 2 | 5.00-5.20 | 5.10 | ||
M3 | L | 1 | 3.40 | 3.40 | ||||
W | 1 | 4.00 | 4.00 | |||||
dp4 | L | 1 | 3.20 | 3.20 | ||||
W | 1 | 2.60 | 2.60 | |||||
p4 | L | 3 | 3.50-3.95 | 3.65 | 1 | 3.90 | 3.90 | |
W | 4 | 3.00-3.40 | 3.18 | 1 | 3.90 | 3.90 | ||
m1 | L | 1 | — | — | 2 | 3.70-4.20 | 3.95 | |
W | 1 | — | — | 2 | 3.90-4.30 | 4.10 | ||
m2 | L | 2 | 4.15-4.20 | 4.18 | 2 | 3.90-4.30 | 4.10 | |
W | 2 | 3.75 | 3.75 | 2 | 4.10-4.40 | 4.25 | ||
m3 | L | 1 | 4.20 | 4.20 | 1 | 4.80 | 4.80 | |
W | 1 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 1 | 4.60 | 4.60 |
Table 9 Measurements of cheek teeth of Hulgana cf. H. ertnia and H. ertnia (mm)
Hulgana cf. H. ertnia | H. ertnia | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
V28609.1-23 | AMNH 26085-26088 | |||||||
Dawson, | ||||||||
n | Range | Mean | n | Range | Mean | |||
P4 | L | 1 | 3.15 | 3.15 | 2 | 3.50-3.90 | 3.70 | |
W | 1 | 3.85 | 3.85 | 2 | 4.60-4.80 | 4.70 | ||
M1 | L | 7 | 3.40-3.70 | 3.53 | 2 | 4.10-4.40 | 4.25 | |
W | 7 | 3.75-4.75 | 4.14 | 2 | 4.80 | 4.80 | ||
M2 | L | 2 | 3.35-3.55 | 3.45 | 2 | 3.70-3.90 | 3.80 | |
W | 1 | 4.45 | 4.45 | 2 | 5.00-5.20 | 5.10 | ||
M3 | L | 1 | 3.40 | 3.40 | ||||
W | 1 | 4.00 | 4.00 | |||||
dp4 | L | 1 | 3.20 | 3.20 | ||||
W | 1 | 2.60 | 2.60 | |||||
p4 | L | 3 | 3.50-3.95 | 3.65 | 1 | 3.90 | 3.90 | |
W | 4 | 3.00-3.40 | 3.18 | 1 | 3.90 | 3.90 | ||
m1 | L | 1 | — | — | 2 | 3.70-4.20 | 3.95 | |
W | 1 | — | — | 2 | 3.90-4.30 | 4.10 | ||
m2 | L | 2 | 4.15-4.20 | 4.18 | 2 | 3.90-4.30 | 4.10 | |
W | 2 | 3.75 | 3.75 | 2 | 4.10-4.40 | 4.25 | ||
m3 | L | 1 | 4.20 | 4.20 | 1 | 4.80 | 4.80 | |
W | 1 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 1 | 4.60 | 4.60 |
Superfamily or family | Species | TNS | MNI | PES (%) | PEF (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ctenodactyloidea | Yuomys cavioides | 22 (A, 22) | 5 (A, 5) | 7.46% | 47.76% |
Yuomys magnus | 15 (B, 15) | 5 (B, 5) | 7.46% | ||
Gobiomys neimongolensis | 34 (A, 33; B, 1) | 8 (A, 7; B, 1) | 11.94% | ||
Gobiomys exiguus | 48 (A, 36; B, 12) | 10 (A, 7; B, 3) | 14.93% | ||
Gobiomys asiaticus | 8 (A, 8) | 4 (A, 4) | 5.97% | ||
Ischyromyidae | Hulgana cf. H. ertnia | 23 (A, 23) | 5 (A, 5) | 7.46% | 7.46% |
Cylindrodontidae | Proardynomys ulausuensis | 1 (A, 1) | 1 (A, 1) | 1.49% | 2.98% |
Gobiocylindrodon sp. | 1 (B, 1) | 1 (B, 1) | 1.49% | ||
Cricetidae | Pappocricetodon rencunensis | 42 (A, 42) | 10 (A, 10) | 14.93% | 14.93% |
Dipodidae | Allosminthus uniconjugatus | 36 (A, 35; B, 1) | 11 (A, 10; B, 1) | 16.42% | 26.87% |
Primisminthus shanghenus | 18 (A, 17; B, 1) | 7 (A, 6; B, 1) | 10.45% |
Table 10 Relative abundance of fossil rodents of the Sharamurunian rodent fauna in the Erlian Basin
Superfamily or family | Species | TNS | MNI | PES (%) | PEF (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ctenodactyloidea | Yuomys cavioides | 22 (A, 22) | 5 (A, 5) | 7.46% | 47.76% |
Yuomys magnus | 15 (B, 15) | 5 (B, 5) | 7.46% | ||
Gobiomys neimongolensis | 34 (A, 33; B, 1) | 8 (A, 7; B, 1) | 11.94% | ||
Gobiomys exiguus | 48 (A, 36; B, 12) | 10 (A, 7; B, 3) | 14.93% | ||
Gobiomys asiaticus | 8 (A, 8) | 4 (A, 4) | 5.97% | ||
Ischyromyidae | Hulgana cf. H. ertnia | 23 (A, 23) | 5 (A, 5) | 7.46% | 7.46% |
Cylindrodontidae | Proardynomys ulausuensis | 1 (A, 1) | 1 (A, 1) | 1.49% | 2.98% |
Gobiocylindrodon sp. | 1 (B, 1) | 1 (B, 1) | 1.49% | ||
Cricetidae | Pappocricetodon rencunensis | 42 (A, 42) | 10 (A, 10) | 14.93% | 14.93% |
Dipodidae | Allosminthus uniconjugatus | 36 (A, 35; B, 1) | 11 (A, 10; B, 1) | 16.42% | 26.87% |
Primisminthus shanghenus | 18 (A, 17; B, 1) | 7 (A, 6; B, 1) | 10.45% |
Fig. 12 Percentage chart of the rodent assemblage compositions of the Ulangochuian (A), Sharamurunian (B), and Irdinmanhan (C) rodent faunas in the Erlian Basin, by minimum number of individuals The ctenodactyloids are represent by red, cricetids by green, ischyromyids by blue, dipodids by purple, and cylindrodontids by gray. The numbers on the horizontal axis are the minimum number of individuals and the numbers in brackets represent its percentage in the fauna
Fig. 14 Stratigraphic distribution of rodent taxa in the Erlian Basin Considering that it involves multiple localities in the Erlian Basin, the figure can only represent the occurrences of a species in the ALMA, but do not give precisely the specific formation that yielded them Ctenodactyloidea is figured as a black square, Tsaganomyidae as a hollow square, Dipodidae as a black triangle, Myodont as a hollow triangle, Cricetidae as a black circle, Ischyromyidae as a hollow circle, Archetypomyidae as a black pentagon, Alagomyidae as a hollow pentagon, and Cylindrodontidae as a hollow star. ALMA. Asian Land Mammal Age
Erlian Basin | Yuanqu Basin | |
---|---|---|
cf. Hulgana eoertnia | √ | |
Hulgana cf. H. ertnia | √ | |
cf. Hulgana. sp. | √ | |
Protataromys mianchiensis | √ | |
Yuomys cavioides | √ | √ |
Yuomys magnus | √ | |
Xueshimys dissectus | √ | |
Gobiomys neimongolensis | √ | |
Gobiomys asiaticus | √ | |
Gobiomys exiguus | √ | |
Anadianomys declivis | √ | |
Zodiomys longmensis | √ | |
Pappocricetodon rencunensis | √ | √ |
Raricricetodon zhongtiaensis | √ | |
Raricricetodon? mino | √ | |
Primisminthus cf. P. jinus | √ | |
Primisminthus shanghenus | √ | √ |
cf. Sinosminthus sp. | √ | |
Allosminthus uniconjugatus | √ | √ |
Proardynomys ulausuensis | √ | |
Gobiocylindrodon sp. | √ |
Table 11 Comparison of Sharamurunian rodent fossil assemblages from the Erlian Basin and the Yuanqu Basin
Erlian Basin | Yuanqu Basin | |
---|---|---|
cf. Hulgana eoertnia | √ | |
Hulgana cf. H. ertnia | √ | |
cf. Hulgana. sp. | √ | |
Protataromys mianchiensis | √ | |
Yuomys cavioides | √ | √ |
Yuomys magnus | √ | |
Xueshimys dissectus | √ | |
Gobiomys neimongolensis | √ | |
Gobiomys asiaticus | √ | |
Gobiomys exiguus | √ | |
Anadianomys declivis | √ | |
Zodiomys longmensis | √ | |
Pappocricetodon rencunensis | √ | √ |
Raricricetodon zhongtiaensis | √ | |
Raricricetodon? mino | √ | |
Primisminthus cf. P. jinus | √ | |
Primisminthus shanghenus | √ | √ |
cf. Sinosminthus sp. | √ | |
Allosminthus uniconjugatus | √ | √ |
Proardynomys ulausuensis | √ | |
Gobiocylindrodon sp. | √ |
[1] | Bai B, Wang Y Q, Li Q et al., 2018. Biostratigraphy and diversity of Paleogene Perissodactyls from the Erlian Basin of Inner Mongolia, China. Am Mus Novit, 3914: 1-60 |
[2] | Berkey C P, Granger W, 1923. Later sediments of the desert basins of central Mongolia. Am Mus Novit, 77: 1-16 |
[3] | Berkey C P, Morris F K, 1927. Geology of Mongolia—a reconnaissance report based on the investigations of the years 1922-1923. In: Natural History of Central Asia. Vol II. New York: American Museum of Natural History. 1-475 |
[4] | Burke J J, 1935. Pseudocylindrodon, a new rodent genus from the Pipestone Springs Oligocene of Montana. Ann Carnegie Mus, 25: 1-4 |
[5] | Burke J J, 1936. Ardynomys and Desmatolagus in the North American Oligocene. Ann Carnegie Mus, 25: 135-154 |
[6] | Chow M C, Rozhdestvensky A K, 1960. Exploration in Inner Mongolia - a preliminary account of the 1959 field work of the Sino-Soviet Paleontological Expedition (SSPE). Vert PalAsiat, 4: 1-10 |
[7] | Dashzeveg D, Meng J, 1998. A new Eocene cylindrodont rodent (Mammalia, Rodentia) from the eastern Gobi of Mongolia. Am Mus Novit, 3253: 1-18 |
[8] | Dawson M R, 1968. Oligocene rodents (Mammalia) from East Mesa, Inner Mongolia. Am Mus Novit, 2324: 1-12 |
[9] | Daxner-Höck G, 2001. New Zapodids (Rodentia) from Oligocene-Miocene deposits in Mongolia. Part 1. Senckenbergiana lethaea, 81: 351-389 |
[10] | Daxner-Höck G, Badamgarav D, Maridet O, 2014. Dipodidae (Rodentia, Mammalia) from the Oligocene and Early Miocene of Mongolia. Ann Naturh Mus Wien, Ser A, 116: 131-214 |
[11] | Douglass E, 1901. Fossil Mammalia of the White River Beds of Montana. Trans Am Philos Soc, Philadelphia, 20: 237-279 |
[12] | Emry R J, Tyutkova L A, Lucas S G et al., 1998. Rodents of the Middle Eocene Shinzhaly Fauna of eastern Kazakatan. J Vert Paleont, 18: 218-227 |
[13] | Fostowicz-Frelik Ł, Li C K, Meng J et al., 2012. New Gobiolagus (Mammalia: Lagomorpha) from the Middle Eocene of Erden Obo (Nei Mongol, China). Vert PalAsiat, 50: 219-236 |
[14] |
Fostowicz-Frelik Ł, Li C K, Mao F Y et al., 2015. A large mimotonid from the Middle Eocene of China sheds light on the evolution of lagomorphs and their kin. Sci Rep, 9394: 1-9, doi: 10.1038/srep09394
DOI URL |
[15] |
Gong H, Li Q, Ni X J, 2021. New species of Yuomys (Rodentia, Ctenodactyloidea) from the upper Eocene of eastern Ningxia, China. J Vert Paleont, doi: 10.1080/02724634.2021.1938099
DOI URL |
[16] | Granger W, 1925. Records of fossils, Mongolia 1925. Third Central Asiatic Expeditions (Field Notes). New York: American Museum of Natural History. 1-76 |
[17] | Granger W, Berkey C P, 1922. Discovery of Cretaceous and older Tertiary strata in Mongolia. Am Mus Novit, 42: 1-7 |
[18] | Huang X S, Zhang J N, 1990. First record of Early Tertiary mammals from southern Yunnan. Vert PalAsiat, 28: 296-303 |
[19] | Jin J H, Liao W B, Wang B S et al., 2003. Global change in Cenozoic and evolution of flora in China. Guihaia, 23: 217-225 |
[20] | Li C K, 1975. Yuomys, a new ischyromyid rodent genus from the Upper Eocene of North China. Vert PalAsiat, 13: 58-70 |
[21] | Li C K, Ting S Y, 1983. The Paleogene mammals of China. Bull Carnegie Mus Nat Hist, 21: 1-93 |
[22] | Li Q, 2012. Middle Eocene Cricetids (Rodentia, Mammalia) from the Erlian Basin, Nei Mongol, China. Vert PalAsiat, 50: 360-364 |
[23] | Li Q, 2016. Eocene fossil rodent assemblages from the Erlian Basin (Inner Mongolia, China): biochronological implications. Palaeoworld, 25: 95-103 |
[24] | Li Q, 2017. Eocene ctenodactyloid rodent assemblages and diversification from Erden Obo, Nei Mongol, China. Hist Biol, 31: 813-823 |
[25] | Li Q, 2018. Additional cricetid and dipodid rodent material from the Erden Obo section, Erlian Basin (Nei Mongol, China) and its biochronological implications. Palaeoworld, 27: 490-505 |
[26] | Li Q, 2020. New late Eocene cylindrodontid rodents from the Erlian Basin (Nei Mongol, China). Palaeobio Palaeoenv, 100: 1083-1094 |
[27] | Li Q, 2021. Additional tsaganomyid, cylindrodontid and ctenodactyloid rodent materials from the Erden Obo section, Erlian Basin (Nei Mongol, China). Vert PalAsiat, 59: 1-17 |
[28] | Li Q, Meng J, 2015. New ctenodactyloid rodents from the Erlian Basin, Nei Mongol, China, and the phylogenetic relationships of Eocene Asian ctenodactyloids. Am Mus Novit, 3828: 1-58 |
[29] | Li Q, Meng J, Wang Y Q, 2016. New cricetid rodents from strata near the Eocene-Oligocene boundary in Erden Obo Section (Nei Mongol, China). PloS One, 11: 1-17 |
[30] | Li Q, Gong Y X, Wang Y Q, 2017. New dipodid rodents from the Late Eocene of Erden Obo (Nei Mongol, China). Hist Biol, 29: 692-703 |
[31] |
Li Q, Wang Y Q, Mao F Y et al., 2019. A new Eocene cylindrodontid rodent from the Erlian Basin (Nei Mongol, China) and its implications for phylogeny and biochronology. J Vert Paleont, 39: e1680990, doi: 10.1080/02724634.2019.1680990
DOI URL |
[32] | Luterbacher H P, Ali J R, Brinkhuis H et al., 2004. The Paleogene Period. In: Gradstein F M, Ogg J G, Smith A eds. A Geological Time Scale 2004. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 384-408 |
[33] | Matthew W D, Granger W, 1925. New creodonts and rodents from the Ardyn Obo Formation of Mongolia. Am Mus Novit, 193: 1-7 |
[34] | Matthew W D, Granger W, 1926. Two new perissodactyls from the Arshanto Eocene of Mongolia. Am Mus Novit, 208: 1-5 |
[35] | Meng J, Ye J, Huang X S, 1999. Eocene mammals from the Bayan Ulan of Nei Mongol (Inner Mongolia) and comments on related straigraphy. Vert PalAsiat, 37: 165-174 |
[36] | Romer A S, 1966. Vertebrate Paleontology. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. 1-467 |
[37] | Rose K D, 1981. The Clarkforkian land-mammal age and mammalian faunal composition across the Paleocene-Eocene boundary. Pap Palaeontol, 26: 1-197 |
[38] | Shi R L, 1989. Late Eocene mammalian fauna of Huangzhuang, Qufu, Shandong. Vert PalAsiat, 27: 87-102 |
[39] | Tong Y S, 1992. Pappocricetodon, a pre-Oligocene cricetid genus (Rodentia) from central China. Vert PalAsiat, 30: 1-16 |
[40] | Tong Y S, 1997. Middle Eocene small mammals from Liguanqiao Basin of Henan Province and Yuanqu Basin of Shanxi Province, Central China. Palaeon Sin, New Ser C, 26: 1-256 |
[41] | Tong Y S, Zheng S H, Qiu Z D, 1995. Cenozoic mammal ages of China. Vert PalAsiat, 33: 290-314 |
[42] | Speijer R P, Pälike H, Hollis C J et al., 2020. The Paleogene Period. In: Gradstein F M, Ogg J G, Schmitz M D et al. eds. Geologic Time Scale 2020. Oxford: Elsevier BV. 1087-1140 |
[43] | Vandenberghe N, Hilgen F L, Speijer R P, 2012. The Paleogene Period. In: Gradstein F M, Ogg J G, Schmitz M D et al. eds. The Geologic Time Scale 2012. Oxford: Elsevier BV. 855-922 |
[44] | Wang B Y, 1985. Zapodidae (Rodentia, Mammalia) from the Lower Oligocene of Qujing, Yunnan, China. Mainzer geowiss Mitt, 14: 354-367 |
[45] | Wang B Y, 1997a. The Mid-Tertiary Ctenodactylidae (Rodentia, Mammalia) of eastern and central Asia. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist, 234: 1-88 |
[46] | Wang B Y, 1997b. Chronological sequence and subdivision of Chinese Oligocene mammalian faunas. J Stratigr, 21: 183-191 |
[47] | Wang B Y, 2001. Eocene ctenodactyloids (Rodentia, Mammalia) from Nei Mongol, China. Vert PalAsiat, 39: 98-114 |
[48] | Wang B Y, 2007. Late Eocene cricetids (Rodentia, Mammalia) from Nei Mongol, China. Vert PalAsiat, 45: 195-212 |
[49] | Wang B Y, 2008. Additional rodent material from Houldjin Formation of Erenhot, Nei Mongol, China. Vert PalAsiat, 46: 21-30 |
[50] | Wang B Y, 2017. Discovery of Yuomys from Altun Shan, Xinjiang, China. Vert PalAsiat, 5: 227-232 |
[51] | Wang B Y, 2019a. “Cylindrodontidae”. In: Qiu Z X, Li C K eds. Palaeovertebrata Sinica, VIII, Basal Synapsids and Mammals, Fascicle 5, Glires II: Rodentia I. Beijing: Science Press. 449-478 |
[52] | Wang B Y, 2019b. “Gobiomyidae”. In: Qiu Z X, Li C K eds. Palaeovertebrata Sinica, VIII, Basal Synapsids and Mammals, Fascicle 5, Glires II: Rodentia I. Beijing: Science Press. 436-440 |
[53] | Wang B Y, Dawson M R, 1994. A primitive cricetid (Mammalia: Rodentia) from the Middle Eocene of Jiangsu Province, China. Ann Carnegie Mus, 63: 239-256 |
[54] | Wang B Y, Zhou S Q, 1982. Late Eocene mammals from Pingchangguan Basin, Henan. Vert PalAsiat, 20: 203-215 |
[55] | Wang B Y, Wu W Y, Qiu Z D, 2020. “Cricetidae”. In: Qiu Z X, Li C K, Zheng S H et al. eds. Palaeovertebrata Sinica VIII, Basal Synapsids and Mammals, Fascicle 5, Glires II: Rodentia II. Beijing: Science Press. 10-151 |
[56] | Wang J W, 1978. Fossil Amynodontidae and Ischyromyidae of Tongbo, Henan. Vert PalAsiat, 16: 22-29 |
[57] | Wang Y Q, Meng J, Ni X J et al., 2007. Major events of Paleogene mammal radiation in China. Geol J, 42: 415-430 |
[58] | Wang Y Q, Meng J, Christopher K B et al., 2010. Early Paleogene stratigraphic sequences, mammalian evolution and its response to environmental changes in Erlian Basin, Inner Mongolia, China. Sci China Earth Sci, 53: 1918-1926 |
[59] | Wang Y Q, Meng J, Jin X, 2012. Comments on Paleogene localities and stratigraphy in the Erlian Basin, Nei Mongol, China. Vert PalAsiat, 50: 181-203 |
[60] |
Wang Y Q, Li Q, Bai B et al., 2019. Paleogene integrative stratigraphy and timescale of China. Sci China Earth Sci, 62: 287-309
DOI |
[61] | Wood A E, 1970. The Early Oligocene rodent Ardynomys (Family Cylindrodontidae) from Mongolia and Montana. Am Mus Novit, 2418: 1-18 |
[62] | Woodburne J M, 1987. Mammal ages, stages, and zones. In: Woodburne M O ed. Cenozoic Mammals of North America: Geochronology and Biostratigraphy. Berkeley: University of California Press. 18-23 |
[63] | Ye J, 1983. Mammalian fauna from the Late Eocene of Ulan Shiren Area, Inner Mongolia. Vert PalAsiat, 21: 109-118 |
[64] | Zdansky O, 1930. Die alttertiären Säugetiere Chinas nebst stratigraphischen Bemerkungen. Palaeont Sin, New Ser C, 6: 1-87 |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||